WASHINGTON
— Senior officials across the government became convinced in January
that the incoming national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, had
become vulnerable to Russian blackmail.
At the F.B.I., the C.I.A.,
the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence — agencies responsible for keeping American secrets safe
from foreign spies — career officials agreed that Mr. Flynn represented
an urgent problem.
Yet
nearly every day for three weeks, the new C.I.A. director, Mike Pompeo,
sat in the Oval Office and briefed President Trump on the nation’s most
sensitive intelligence — with Mr. Flynn listening. Mr. Pompeo has not
said whether C.I.A. officials left him in the dark about their views of
Mr. Flynn, but one administration official said Mr. Pompeo did not share
any concerns about Mr. Flynn with the president.
The
episode highlights a remarkable aspect of Mr. Flynn’s tumultuous,
25-day tenure in the White House: He sat atop a national security
apparatus that churned ahead despite its own conclusion that he was at
risk of being compromised by a hostile foreign power.
The
concerns about Mr. Flynn’s vulnerabilities, born from misleading
statements he made to White House officials about his conversations with
the Russian ambassador, are at the heart of a legal and political storm
that has engulfed the Trump administration. Many of Mr. Trump’s
political problems, including the appointment of a special counsel and
the controversy over the firing of the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey,
can ultimately be traced to Mr. Flynn’s stormy tenure.
Time
and again, the Trump administration looked the other way in the face of
warning signs about Mr. Flynn. Mr. Trump entrusted him with the
nation’s secrets despite knowing that he faced a Justice Department investigation over his undisclosed foreign lobbying. Even a personal warning from President Barack Obama did not dissuade him.
Mr.
Pompeo sidestepped questions from senators last month about his
handling of the information about Mr. Flynn, declining to say whether he
knew about his own agency’s concerns. “I can’t answer yes or no,” he
said. “I regret that I’m unable to do so.” His words frustrated Senator
Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat and a member of the Senate Intelligence
Committee.
“Either
Director Pompeo had no idea what people in the C.I.A. reportedly knew
about Michael Flynn, or he knew about the Justice Department’s concerns
and continued to discuss America’s secrets with a man vulnerable to
blackmail,” Mr. Wyden said in a statement. “I believe Director Pompeo
owes the public an explanation.”
After
Mr. Pompeo’s Senate testimony, The New York Times asked officials at
several agencies whether Mr. Pompeo had raised concerns about Mr. Flynn
to the president and, if so, whether the president had ignored him. One
administration official responded on the condition of anonymity that Mr.
Pompeo, whether he knew of the concerns or not, had not told the
president about them.
A C.I.A. spokesman declined to discuss any interactions between the president and Mr. Pompeo.
“Whether
the C.I.A. director briefed the president on a specific intelligence
issue during a specific time frame is not something we publicly comment
on, and we’re not about to start today,” said the spokesman, Dean Boyd.
Concerns
across the government about Mr. Flynn were so great after Mr. Trump
took office that six days after the inauguration, on Jan. 26, the acting
attorney general, Sally Q. Yates, warned the White House that Mr. Flynn had been “compromised.”
Ms.
Yates’s concerns focused on phone calls that Mr. Flynn had in late
December with Sergey I. Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United
States. When the White House faced questions about whether the two men
had discussed lifting American sanctions on Russia, Vice President Mike
Pence told reporters that Mr. Flynn had assured him that sanctions were
not discussed. Intelligence officials knew otherwise, based on routine
intercepts of Mr. Kislyak’s conversations.
“That
created a compromise situation,” Ms. Yates later told Congress, “a
situation where the national security adviser essentially could be
blackmailed by the Russians.”
Mr.
Trump waited 18 days from that warning before firing Mr. Flynn, a
period in which Mr. Pompeo continued to brief Mr. Flynn and the
president. The White House has offered changing explanations for why the
president waited until Feb. 13 — soon after Ms. Yates’s warning made
national news — before firing Mr. Flynn.
White
House officials have said they moved deliberately both out of respect
for Mr. Flynn and because they were not sure how seriously they should
take the concerns. They also said the president believed that Ms. Yates, an Obama administration holdover, had a political agenda. She was fired days later over her refusal to defend in court Mr. Trump’s ban on travel for people from several predominantly Muslim countries.
A
warning from Mr. Pompeo might have persuaded the White House to take
Ms. Yates’s concerns more seriously. Mr. Pompeo, a former congressman,
is a Republican stalwart whom Mr. Trump has described as “brilliant and
unrelenting.”
Mr.
Pompeo was sworn in three days before Ms. Yates went to the White
House. He testified last month that he did not know what was said in
that meeting. By that time, C.I.A. officials had attended meetings with
F.B.I. agents about Mr. Flynn and reviewed the transcripts of his
conversations with the Russian ambassador, according to several current
and former American security officials. Separately, intelligence
agencies were aware that Russian operatives had discussed ways to use their relationship with Mr. Flynn to influence Mr. Trump.
Mr. Pompeo, who briefs the president nearly every day, had frequent opportunities to raise the issue with Mr. Trump.
The President’s Daily Brief
is a rundown of what America’s spies consider the most pressing issues
facing the United States. On any given day, it can include details of a
terrorist plot being hatched overseas, an analysis of a foreign
political crisis that threatens American interests or a look at foreign
hackers who are trying to breach American government computer systems.
Each
president takes the briefing differently. Mr. Obama was said to prefer
reading it on a secure tablet. President George W. Bush liked his
briefers to talk through the document they were presenting. Mr. Pompeo
has described Mr. Trump as a voracious consumer of the briefing who
likes maps, charts, pictures, videos and “killer graphics.”
At
an event last month at Westwood Country Club in Northern Virginia, Mr.
Pompeo told retired C.I.A. officials that his briefings often ran past
their scheduled 30 minutes, according to one retired official in
attendance. Mr. Pompeo said Mr. Trump was eager for information and
asked many questions.
At
his confirmation hearing, Mr. Pompeo assured senators that he would
provide the president with unvarnished information, even when it would
be viewed as unpleasant. “I can tell you that I have assured the
president-elect that I’ll do that,” Mr. Pompeo said.
On
Capitol Hill, Mr. Wyden questioned why Mr. Pompeo continued having
discussions with Mr. Flynn despite the concerns of intelligence
officials. “He was the national security adviser,” Mr. Pompeo said. “He
was present for the daily brief on many occasions.”
Mr.
Flynn had no love for the C.I.A., and the feeling was mutual. An Army
general who had risen to lead the Defense Intelligence Agency, Mr. Flynn
emerged in retirement as a C.I.A. critic, blaming the agency for his
firing and what he called its failure to foresee the rise of the Islamic
State. He insisted the Obama administration had politicized the agency,
an assertion Mr. Pompeo later said he saw no evidence to support.
No comments:
Post a Comment