Editorial of the New York Times
In
the face of America’s abysmal voter participation rates, lawmakers have
two choices: They can make voting easier, or they can make it harder.
Illinois made the right choice
this week, becoming the 10th state, along with the District of
Columbia, to enact automatic voter registration. The bill, which could
add as many as one million voters to the state’s rolls, was signed by
Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican who had vetoed similar legislation last
year.
Under
the new law, all eligible voters will be registered to vote when they
visit the Department of Motor Vehicles or other state agencies. If they
do not want to be registered, they may opt out.
“The
right to vote is foundational for the rights of Americans in our
democracy,” Mr. Rauner said at a bill-signing ceremony on Monday. “We as
a people need to do everything we can to knock down barriers, remove
hurdles for all those who are eligible to vote, to be able to vote.”
Consider
Texas, which is pushing relentlessly in the opposite direction of
Illinois. Republican lawmakers there passed in 2011, and continue to
defend today, one of the nation’s most restrictive voter-ID laws, which
has been tied up in court challenges from the start. Last week a federal
judge in Corpus Christi struck down
the law on the grounds that it intentionally discriminated against
black and Latino voters, who tend to vote Democratic, in violation of
the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. The acceptable forms of
identification — a gun permit, for example, but not a student ID card —
were more likely to be held by white voters, the judge found.
The judge, Nelva Gonzales Ramos, had invalidated portions of the law in 2014, but gave the state a chance for a do-over. In her latest ruling, Judge Ramos found that Texas’ fixes offered no improvement.
For instance, a new provision requires prospective voters without a
photo ID to sign an affidavit that threatens severe penalties for
perjury — but that only “trades one obstacle to voting with another,”
the judge wrote. (President Trump’s Justice Department disagreed. The
department under President Barack Obama had sued to block the original
law, but now it has switched sides, arguing that the revised law is not discriminatory.)
The voter-ID law is one of several recent cases
in which federal courts have found that Texas is discriminating against
minorities in voting. You’d think state officials would get the
message, but they’re as defiant as ever. Ken Paxton, Texas’ attorney
general, has appealed the rulings, calling them “outrageous.”
What’s
really outrageous is the brazenness with which Republican lawmakers
continue to hawk their antivoter laws, and their bogus claims of
widespread fraud, pretending to care about electoral integrity when what
they’re really after is a smaller, whiter electorate that they believe
is their ticket to eternal victory. If Texas really cared about
integrity, it would invest in educating the public about how to get the
free identification that it now offers as one option.
But even though an
estimated 600,000 registered Texas voters lack that ID, the state issued only 869 free IDs between 2013 and 2017, according to a report by ProPublica.
Meanwhile
in Oregon, which in 2015 became the first state to pass automatic voter
registration, more than 272,000 people were registered in the law’s
first year, according to an analysis
by the Center for American Progress. Of these, 116,000 were found to be
unlikely to have registered otherwise, and 40,000 of that group voted
in 2016, helping Oregon achieve the nation’s largest turnout increase
from 2012 — 4.1 points, to 68.3 percent. Contrary to Republican fears,
that increase did not equal Democratic gains. Democrats lost seats in
the State Legislature, even though the new voters were more racially diverse than previously registered voters.
In
other words, increasing voter participation should be a bipartisan
project. That hasn’t been the case for years, and it won’t be as long as
President Trump is in the White House, deputizing his merry band of vote suppressors to justify his myth of illegal voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment