By Jeremy Scahill
Jeremy Scahill: Earlier this month, the
Federal Election Commission issued a historic fine and cited The
Intercept’s 2016 investigative series called “Foreign Influence.” That
series was written by Jon Schwarz and Lee Fang, and through dogged
reporting, they managed to expose a major violation of campaign finance
law’s strict prohibition against foreign money being used in U.S.
federal elections. Their reporting was so critical that the FEC, which
rarely catches these sorts of violations, actually punished both the
Chinese-owned company which donated the money, and the Super PAC which
received it, fining them a combined total of $940,000. Before Citizens
United in 2010, corporations couldn’t spend money to directly advocate
for federal candidates. After Citizens United and related court
decisions, corporations that were formed in the U.S.—even ones that are
completely owned and controlled by foreigners—could send money to super
PACs in unlimited amounts. Enter Jeb Bush in 2016. That’s right, Jeb.
Jeb Bush: I think the next
president needs to be a lot quieter but send a signal that we’re
prepared to act in the national security interests of this country, to
get back in the business of creating a more peaceful world. Please clap.
Jeremy Scahill: Jeb’s sad campaign was
backed by a super PAC called “Right to Rise USA.” They received over a
million dollars in donations from a California corporation called
American Pacific International Capital, or APIC. That company, APIC, was
controlled completely by two Chinese citizens living in Singapore. So
remember, it’s illegal for foreign nationals to contribute money in
connection to U.S. elections. But APIC and Jeb Bush’s “Right to Rise
USA,” tried to get away with using the loophole created by Citizens
United. Because APIC was incorporated in California, it was technically
not foreign. And the financial contribution would have been fine if they
had not egregiously violated one part of the law still on the books.
That part of the law limits this sort of foreign influence. When
foreign-owned corporations make political donations, only U.S. citizens
are supposed to make the decision. My colleagues at The Intercept, along
with reporter Elaine Yu in Hong Kong, got Gordon Tang, the Chinese
national at the head of APIC, to admit that he helped make the decision
to donate to Jeb Bush. And that was very illegal. Here is The
Intercept’s Jon Schwarz to walk us through this bizarre tale.
Jon Schwarz: So, in 2010, the
Supreme Court famously decides in Citizens United, that U.S. campaign
finance law was wrong. Before Citizens United, you could only contribute
money for U.S. political campaigns in limited amounts. It had to come
from individual citizens. After Citizens United, corporations, unions
could put unlimited amounts of money. It could go to super PACs for
instance, and as long as they were theoretically not coordinating with
individual candidates, they could take this unlimited amount of money
and then spend it however they wanted, promoting anything. Very soon
after the Citizens United decision in 2010 was Obama’s State of the
Union Address, and in it, he said —
Barack Obama: With all due
deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a
century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special
interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our
elections.
Jon Schwarz: What is the significance
of that? If you look at the law, what is says is this: Foreign nationals
are forbidden from putting money into U.S. elections. A foreign
national is a foreign individual, it is a foreign government, and it is a
foreign corporation. What happens if there is a U.S. corporation that
is a wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign corporation? Well, according
to U.S. law, that corporation counts as a U.S. national, meaning that a
completely foreign-owned corporation could now, post-Citizens United,
put as much money as they wanted into U.S. politics.
Barack Obama: I don’t think American
elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests; or
worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American
people. And I’d urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps
correct some of these problems.
Jon Schwarz: So six years later, Ellen
Weintraub, then on the Federal Election Commission, now the chairman of
the FEC, wrote an op-ed for the New York Times about this issue about:
Are foreign-owned corporations going to able to spend without limit in
U.S. elections?
Jon Schwarz: Lee Fang and I thought
this is an interesting question. We decided to look into it, see what
corporations were giving money to U.S. super PACs, and find out whether
there was foreign ownership of any of them. And within 10 minutes of
trying to find this out, we saw something that looked tremendously
suspicious, which was a corporation called American Pacific
International Capital located in San Francisco.
Just a little bit of Googling found
information that suggested this was in fact 100 percent foreign owned
and it had given $1.3 million to the “Right to Rise USA” super PAC,
which was supporting Jeb Bush’s 2016 presidential candidacy.
Jeb Bush: We’re 17 months from
the time for choosing. The stakes for America’s future are about as
great as they come. Our prosperity and our security are in the balance.
So is opportunity in this nation where every life matters and everyone
has the right to rise.
Jon Schwarz: What we found out after
speaking to Charlie Spies, who was the treasurer of “Right to Rise USA”
and one of the most prominent campaign finance lawyers in the United
States, was that Spies had actually written a memo explaining
step-by-step how you could put foreign money into U.S. elections and
have it be legal. We also spoke to Gordon Tang, who was the Chinese businessman behind APIC.
[Audio:
Gordon Tang, speaking in Cantonese, tells reporter Elaine Yu why the
company gave over $1 million to Right to Rise USA, the main Super PAC
supporting Jeb Bush.]
Jon Schwarz And to our great shock, he
essentially unknowingly confessed to having broken U.S. campaign
finance law. There are still some remaining weak prohibitions that you
should be able to abide by that really can’t be easily enforced that
will only create problems for you if reporters call you and you
accidentally confess.
Jon Schwarz: If Gordon Tang had just
kept his mouth shut, if he hadn’t told us, oh yes, you know, I said this
seems like a good idea to me, then they would have been fine. They
would have been able to, as Obama said, spend without limit in U.S.
elections and there really should not have been any legal consequences.
They just got sloppy. What’s crucial here is this fact: there’s sort of
the law as written and the law as possible to be enforced. The law as
written says: Yes, foreign-owned corporations can participate now in
U.S. elections, but foreign nationals can’t participate in the decision
making in terms of putting the money into the U.S. electoral process.
Now, we were expecting that when this
article came out, it would make huge news. You know, foreign
interference in U.S. elections. It’s proven now. Obama called it, here
it is. Essentially, nothing happened. No one paid any attention. It was
the summer of 2016. It was around the time of the U.S. Democratic and
Republican conventions. What we thought was an enormous story went
nowhere.
Now what happened then was: The
Campaign Legal Center, which is sort of an election law watchdog in
Washington, picked up our article, used the information in it to say,
hey, this seems like a clear violation of very significant U.S. campaign
finance law. They filed a complaint with the FEC. And then, no one
heard anything for two and a half years. The FEC generally does not
enforce U.S. campaign finance law. The Republican Party pretty much as
policy now believes that campaign finance law is illegitimate and they
simply at the FEC block it from being enforced. So we thought nothing
was going to happen. And then, to our surprise, something did.
Rachel Maddow: You don’t hear
news like this all that often. You hardly ever hear about it on this
scale. But a super PAC from the 2016 campaign, a super PAC that
supported Jeb Bush for president, has just been hit by federal officials
with a huge fine for accepting donations from foreigners.
Jon Schwarz: It became public that the
FEC was issuing the third largest fine in its history, the largest fine
since Citizens United, almost $1 million. Both APIC, the foreign-owned
corporation, and “Right to Rise,” the Jeb Bush super PAC, had to pay
fines. Now, what it suggests is not just the fact that this was going
on, that this happened for sure in 2016. But that with people who are
more careful, it is probably going on in ways that can’t be detected.
The reality is, foreign countries,
foreign corporations, foreign individuals have very, very good reasons
to try to influence U.S. politics. If I were a foreigner, I would try to
influence U.S. politics. Of course, you have to. We’re the most
powerful country on earth. You would be a fool not to try to do this.
And as I say, people who are more sophisticated about it should be able
to pull this off without detection.
So, what does this mean right now?
What it means is that post-Citizens United this absolutely can happen.
It means that we don’t know what is happening. I would also encourage
people to think about the fact that there is foreign influence on U.S.
politics in all kinds of ways that was already legal before Citizens
United. There’s tons of money that flows into think tanks in Washington.
There’s tons of money that flows into lobbying organizations in
Washington in ways that are perfectly legal but involve foreign
influence on U.S. politics.
I hope that other reporters will look
at this and realize that this was just out there in the open for anybody
to find. Like, this information is probably there for other
corporations, we just don’t know it yet. And this is actually something
that anybody could do. Like, anybody can go look through the campaign
finance filings. They’re on the FEC’s website. They’re at the Center for
Responsive Politics. If you are interested in this issue, even if
you’re not a journalist, go comb through this and send it to reporters. I
guarantee you that they’ll be interested to hear about anything you
find.
Jon Schwarz: That was my colleague at
The Intercept, Jon Schwarz. You can check out that series at
theintercept.com. It was called “Foreign Influence.” Jon spoke to our
assistant producer, Elise Swain.
No comments:
Post a Comment