Source: Electronic Frontier Foundation
The US government, with assistance from major telecommunications
carriers including AT&T, has engaged in a massive program of illegal
dragnet surveillance of domestic communications and communications
records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001.
News reports in December 2005 first revealed that the National Security Agency
(NSA) has been intercepting Americans’ phone calls and Internet
communications. Those news reports, combined with a USA Today story in
May 2006 and the statements of several members of Congress, revealed
that the NSA is also receiving wholesale copies of American's telephone
and other communications records. All of these surveillance activities
are in violation of the privacy safeguards established by Congress and
the US Constitution.
The evidence also shows that the government did not act alone. EFF has obtained whistleblower evidence [PDF]
from former AT&T technician Mark Klein showing that AT&T is
cooperating with the illegal surveillance. The undisputed documents show
that AT&T installed a fiberoptic splitter at its facility at 611
Folsom Street in San Francisco that makes copies of all emails web
browsing and other Internet traffic to and from AT&T customers and
provides those copies to the NSA. This copying includes both domestic
and international Internet activities of AT&T customers. As one
expert observed “this isn’t a wiretap, it’s a country-tap.”
EFF is fighting these illegal activities in the courts. Currently,
EFF is representing victims of the illegal surveillance program in Jewel v. NSA, a
lawsuit filed in September 2008 seeking to stop the warrantless
wiretapping and hold the government and government officials officials
behind the program accountable.
Previously, in Hepting v. AT&T, EFF
filed the first case against a cooperating telecom for violating its
customers' privacy. After Congress expressly intervened in the FISA
Amendments Act to allow the Executive to require dismissal of the
case, the case was ultimately dismissed by the US Supreme Court.
ALWAYS HOPE FOR A BETTER FUTURE! Follow the News with an open mind. Never stop asking to find out the truth! Criticisms / Disagreements lead to a better future. Participation of all is the key. This page is also a way to improve your English. Be critical of the current president
Showing posts with label abc news exclusive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abc news exclusive. Show all posts
Friday
NSA Spying on American
Labels:
abc news exclusive,
confusion,
corruption,
crisis,
Democracy,
Freedom,
Inside,
Learning English,
mind,
politics,
Power,
spying,
Taiwan,
Teacher
Dick Cheney calls Obama worse than Jimmy Carter
It is amazing to me that Dick Cheney calls Obama worse than
Jimmy Carter after what he and President J.W. Bush have done to our world and
the economy.
We need to take a closer look at the Republican Party. Do they
have the good of the American people in mind or only the good of the wealthiest
people in the world?
No matter how you look at it, a politician should represent
all people, not only the ones who give them the most money. A politician
should be a representative of the people in its country and always have the peace and happiness of all people around the world in mind.
Neither Dick Cheney nor J.W. Bush nor W. Mitt Romney are
these kind of politician.They only have their own agenda. Their ideology is to let the banks and corporations do whatever they want as long as the make more money for them and to be a long-term advocate of tax cuts but mostly for the wealthiest in the country!
Labels:
abc news exclusive,
global financial crisis,
Money,
News,
Obama,
politics,
Power,
Video,
Washington
Thursday
President Obama - Gay Marriage: 'Gay Couples Should Be Able to Get Marriage" (Video/Transcript)
Transcript
"I have to tell you as I said, I have gone through an evolution on this issue, I have always been adamant that gay and lesbian American should be treated fairly and equally. And that's why in addition to everything we have done in this administration rolling back don't ask don't tell so that outstanding Americans can serve our country, whether it's no longer defending the defense against the marriage act which try to federalize uh what is historically state law. I have stood on the side of broader equality for the LGBG (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community and I hesitated, on gay marriage in part because I thought civil unions would be sufficient, but that was something that would give people hospital visitation rights and other elements that we take for granted, uh and I was sensitive to the fact, that for a lot of people the word marriage was something that evokes very powerful tradition, religious beliefs and so forth.
But I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors, when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together; when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that 'don't ask, don't tell' is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married. "
"I have to tell you as I said, I have gone through an evolution on this issue, I have always been adamant that gay and lesbian American should be treated fairly and equally. And that's why in addition to everything we have done in this administration rolling back don't ask don't tell so that outstanding Americans can serve our country, whether it's no longer defending the defense against the marriage act which try to federalize uh what is historically state law. I have stood on the side of broader equality for the LGBG (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community and I hesitated, on gay marriage in part because I thought civil unions would be sufficient, but that was something that would give people hospital visitation rights and other elements that we take for granted, uh and I was sensitive to the fact, that for a lot of people the word marriage was something that evokes very powerful tradition, religious beliefs and so forth.
But I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors, when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together; when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that 'don't ask, don't tell' is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married. "
Labels:
abc news exclusive,
Gay Marriage,
Learning English,
politics,
President,
Speech,
White-House
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)